Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-15 15:26:32

Next message: Joaquin M López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [devector] optimum growing/insertion policy"
Previous message: Mikhail Strelnikov: "Re: [boost] How to build boost on windows with Clang/LLVM"
In reply to: Damien Buhl: "Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?"
Next in thread: Marc Glisse: "Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?"
Reply: Marc Glisse: "Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?"

> So personally I stay inclined that defining
> BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY+BOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED would be a
> better default in the future. :D

Requiring use from a DLL wholly prevents misoperation on Windows and
Mac, unless you mix Boost versions. That's why those macros are off by
default and should stay that way.

(Incidentally SG14 may be proposing a std2::error_code fixing the known
problems with std::error_code, but it's some years out yet)

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/

Next message: Joaquin M López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [devector] optimum growing/insertion policy"
Previous message: Mikhail Strelnikov: "Re: [boost] How to build boost on windows with Clang/LLVM"
In reply to: Damien Buhl: "Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?"
Next in thread: Marc Glisse: "Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?"
Reply: Marc Glisse: "Re: [boost] [system] Header-only Boost.System by default ?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk