Re: [boost] What hash functions should be included in a hypothetical Boost hash-v2 library?

Subject: Re: [boost] What hash functions should be included in a hypothetical Boost hash-v2 library?
From: Julien Vernay (julienvernay99_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-31 08:02:48

I use personally MurmurHash3 because I found open implementations both at
compile-time and runtime.

Le 31 déc. 2017 01:29, "Peter Dimov via Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]> a
écrit :

> What (non-cryptographic) hash functions should a hypothetical future Boost
> hash library contain? Have clear winners emerged by now? Which ones do
> people prefer?
>
> SipHash is basically a given, but it's not optimized for speed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman
> /listinfo.cgi/boost
>