Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [release notes] Linking to github issues/pull requests
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-12 12:41:28


On 01/12/18 15:23, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 12.01.2018 06:36, Daniel James via Boost wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've added templates for linking to github issues and pull requests
>> from the release notes. There are two templates:
>>
>> [github module number] which expands to '#number'
>> [github_pr module number] which expands to 'PR#number'.
>>
>> Both will be linked, they need the name of the module to link to the
>> right place.
>>
>> We only really need the issue template as github redirects to the pull
>> request if appropriate, but existing release notes have been using the
>> PR#3 format, so I thought it should support that.
>>
>> You can see an example in the unordered release notes for 1.67.0:
>>
>> https://github.com/boostorg/website/blob/master/feed/history/boost_1_67_0.qbk
>> http://www.boost.org/users/history/in_progress.html
>>
>> Does that look okay?
>
> Anything that increases the coupling between boost projects worries me.
> I think this proposal would work much better if it was used to generate
> per-project release notes. Nothing speaks against linking to per-project
> release-notes from a single boost release document. but the logic to
> syndicate that information shouldn't lead to more coupling.

Just providing links to project-specific release notes is not enough,
IMO. I would prefer aggregated release notes to be readable in one
place, even if they are collected from project-specific sources.
Although I don't see much problem with the current setup as well.

In any case, that is a completely different piece of work from what
Daniel have done.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk