Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: Rob Stewart (rstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-06 09:31:01

On February 3, 2018 8:56:35 AM EST, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2018-02-02 23:26 GMT+01:00 Emil Dotchevski via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]>:
> 
> There are probably more cases, but my point is:
> 
> 1. Outcome is not meant to be a full failure-handling framework for
> every
> part of every program (even though it is technically possible to use
> it this way).
> 2. It addresses the specific cases through specific trade-offs where
> it does not have to address all the issues of the full failure
> handling framework.

This sort of thing would have been useful in the docs to explain how outcome could fit into one's code.

--
Rob
(Sent from my portable computation device.)