Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-09 15:45:22

Am 09.02.2018 4:21 nachm. schrieb "Edward Diener via Boost" <
boost_at_[hidden]>:

On 2/9/2018 4:49 AM, Richard Hodges via Boost wrote:

> What do you propose to do with libraries that want to keep C++03
>> compatibility and rely on Boost.Test in tests?
>>
>
> Demand that they be upgraded or drop them in favour of better-behaved ones.
>
> Only the future is ahead. The past is irrelevant.
>
> A library that demands c++03 is not a c++ library. It’s merely a blocker
> to productivity. It must adapt or die.
>

Since C++03 is the lowest level of C++ standards compatibility, it can
hardly "demand" anything. If you think it does please point out a C++03
construct which is not supported by later C++ standards.

std::auto_ptr.

>
>
>
>
> On 9 Feb 2018, at 09:45, Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/09/18 12:13, Olaf van der Spek via Boost wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost
>>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> * is there any better option? All the other options I see are even
>>>> worse.
>>>>
>>> Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these
>>> issues?
>>>
>>
>> What do you propose to do with libraries that want to keep C++03
>> compatibility and rely on Boost.Test in tests?
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman
/listinfo.cgi/boost