Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Debate until Decision
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-03-31 18:53:54


On 31 March 2018 at 16:24, mike via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Mateusz
>> Loskot via Boost
>> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 6:18 PM
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Cc: Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]>
>> Subject: Re: [boost] Debate until Decision
>>
>> IMHO, modularisation of Boost eco-system should be followed by
>> agreement to establish such PMC or PSC (Project Steering Committee).
>>
>> Actually, the CMT may be seen as a forerunner for such initiative.
>>
>> > b) delegated responsibilities
>> > [...]
>>
>> Could be taken over by each PSC.
>>
>
> Are individual boost libraries actually big enough projects to warrant such a committee?

Some are, with at least 2-3 active core maintainers, and some are certainly not

> My impression was that most libraries are mostly just one man/woman projects and I don't se, why you need a committee for that.

A committee with benevolent dictator as a sole member should be fine
too, why not.

Best regards,

-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk