Re: [boost] Is there interest in an "iofiber" library?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in an "iofiber" library?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-01-06 07:46:58

Am Sa., 5. Jan. 2019 um 23:54 Uhr schrieb David Sankel via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]>:

> >    - The dependency on C++11 (e.g. fiber objects are move-only handles
> >    just like thread objects). ASIO is a C++98 library.
> >    - Scope-creep within ASIO?
> >
> >
> It seems like it would be a good idea to broach the subject with Chris to
> see what his thoughts are. It seems like this is a replacement for
> something that already exists in ASIO. He may be happy to see this live in
> another library.
>

If boost.asio would be C++11, the lib could simply migrate from boost.
coroutine to boost.coroutine2 by changing the coro namespace.
I guess that a separate library would make more sense.