Re: [boost] question/guidence regarding merge to master

Subject: Re: [boost] question/guidence regarding merge to master
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-01-11 10:32:17

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 11:26, Andrey Semashev via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 1/11/19 5:58 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> >
> > My guideline is:
> >
> > - work that has passed local tests goes into a feature branch
> > - feature branches that have passed CI go into develop
> > - develop that has not broken anything goes into master
> >
> > That is, develop is not a place for experimentation (or, ironically
> > stated, develop is not for development).
>
> What's the purpose of develop then?

Production staging?
A safety net master is always shippable?

But I've also wondered about it, hence my question in response to Robert's post.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net