Re: [atomic] Bikeshedding over address-free waiting/notifying operation names

From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-01 10:50:30

On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 16:05, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The "address-free"
> term comes from the C++ standard, but the resulting names seem a bit
> long. Maybe there are better suggestions?
>

What about "global_"-prefix or "_system"-post-fix ("_sys")?

degski
-- 
@systemdeg
https://www.instapaper.com <http://instapaper.com>
"We value your privacy, click here!" Sod off! - degski