Re: Boost website changes and .'cxxstd'

From: Alexander Grund (alexander.grund_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-07 08:10:42

>> Looking at this, I think that we need to drop the "Standard" part. 
>> It's mostly empty, the places it says things like "TR1" aren't 
>> helpful, and it's easy to misinterpret it as the minimum required C++ 
>> level.
>
> I fully agree. Also the top line which give different views of the 
> library documentation can probably drop the "Standard Proposals" and 
> "TR1 libraries" views, since these are really obsolete by now. 
Woops, also just seen that the text is to long. I see e.g. "C++ standard 
minimum lev11". Maybe just "Minimum C++ standard"? Or even "Min. C++ 
standard"?