Re: The standard library is better documented

From: René Ferdinand Rivera Morell (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-12-02 15:57:48

On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 2:08 AM Niilo Huovila via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> By better I mean cppreference.com. There's a page for pretty much
> everything in the standard library. Related pages are linked. The
> preconditions and behavior of functions are specified. Consequentially I
> come to Boost only when the standard library doesn't do enough. If you
> are going to compete with the standard library instead of just
> supplementing it, you need outstanding documentation.

It would be useful if you could point to instances of Boost libraries
that could use better documentation.

-- 
-- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell
-- Don't Assume Anything  -- No Supone Nada
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net