|
|
Boost Docs : |
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-28 07:49:32
Paul A Bristow wrote:
>
> | Paul A Bristow wrote:
> | > I can't see why Quickbook comments are wanted in the XML.
> | >
> | We need it in order to do some more post processing of the XML.
> | At least that's how I understand Dave's need for it.
>
> I can see that but wouldn't an explicit mechanism, say [xml ...] be
clearer and better, and not clutter the xml with comments.
>
> It would be helpful to have the licence info replicated of course and
>
the licence as comment mechanism does now does that - or does
> it?
>
> Or is there something more complicated here?
No, you have good points. DocBook has the right facility already in the
form of <phrase role="some stuff">. Dave, I think Paul is right. We
do not need the Quickbook comments in the XML.
Regards,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net