Re: [Boost-docs] [boost-docs] box wrappers proof of concept

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-15 12:44:05

>-----Original Message-----
>From: boost-docs-bounces_at_[hidden] 
>[mailto:boost-docs-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of 
>Matias Capeletto
>Sent: 15 June 2007 17:32
>To: boost-docs_at_[hidden]
>Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] [boost-docs] box wrappers proof of concept
>
>On 6/15/07, Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >http://tinyurl.com/ysk7z8
>>
>> Looks good, but
>>
>> Try some superscrips and subscripts: x2, xi3, α2, βα, ⌊x⌋, ⌊α⌋, ⌈a⌉.
>>
>> still displays as ?x?, ?a?, ?a?
>
>I get: ⌊x⌋, ⌊α⌋, ⌈a⌉. here. 
Correct!
> What this notation means?

These are math symbols for floor and ceil functions.

And they never show right on IE6 - pathetic!  Just a square box :-((

>> until I check out the html4 symbols - which show OK - and 
>after that the other symbols display right too!
>
>It is not happening here. weird :P
>I do not think that this problem is on our side.
>
>> (I've checked this three times, so I'm sure it is right.
>>
>> Firefox 2.0)
>>
>> Weird!
>
>Yep... Do you want me to insert n html4 symbol at the first 
>page of each lib? :P
>(I am just joking)

No - but Nice try ;-)

>> PS Boxes with Boost libraries, section search are in a 
>muddle on a big resolution 1600 x 1200 screen.  OK at 1024 x 768 :-)
>
>Nice screen you have there :)

"If a little does it well, a lot will do it better!" I always say ;-)

>I have been testing it under 1024x768 (17') and 1440x900 (19' ws). If
>others want to help me and hack the css if it does not work with your
>resolution it will be great.

Tell me where to hack...

Paul

---
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
[phone] & SMS, Mobile [phone] & SMS
pbristow_at_[hidden]