Re: [Boost-docs] [boostbook] Boostbook error when generating documentation for a member typedef with a description

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] [boostbook] Boostbook error when generating documentation for a member typedef with a description
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-05 22:08:03

On Thursday 04 October 2007 20:15 pm, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Yes please... A note for the IBD team... Doing a bunch of changes to
> BoostBook on the side is fine as it lets people see what changes
> look/behave like collectively. But we really need small individual
> patches against the trunk so we can incrementally evaluate and apply them.

Is that the plan?  I don't mind submitting the changes I've made to boost_docs 
as patches to the trunk, although I got the impression from Matias he was 
expecting something more like a mini-review would happen eventually, and then 
all the boostbook changes in boost_docs would get merged.  I wouldn't want to 
bother with creating a bunch of small patches if that is going to happen.

Also, has any clear maintainer for boostbook emerged?  What happens when I 
post a patch and no one has anything to say about it?  Can I declare "Qui 
tacet consentit" after a week or so and commit it to the trunk anyways?

-- 
Frank