Re: [ublas] indirect_array & vector_indirect

From: Jon Pearce (j.pearce_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-05 12:23:13

Hi Michael, 

Thank you very much for your response.

>> > I would be grateful for any comments. In particular
>> > * Does anyone else see this as a problem?
>> > * Would it be a good idea to modify the current implementation? (Does
>> > anyone currently rely on the default behaviour, such that they would be
>> > affected by a change)
>  
>

> I think a change would be reasonable. I certainly don't rely on this 
> behaviour.
> 
> We could effect such a by using:
> 	if (this != &all_)
> 
> In this case only the explicit use of all() would break your invariant.

If nobody else objects, might you possibly have a chance to make this change in the UBlas CVS repository?

Thank you again

Jon