Re: [ublas] conflicting overloads for lu_substitute

From: Gunter Winkler (guwi17_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-12 16:50:32

Michael Stevens schrieb:
> I need some feedback on what to do here. At present:
> a) the code is not compilable because the two overloads as they are defined 
> are ambigeous.
> b) the second overload seems to be incorrectly implemented anyway (see my 
> comments above)
I suggest a complete rewrite of the triangular solvers, because 1) the 
dispatch logic is horrible, 2) they are awfully slow and 3) I have 
nearly finished a better version ;-)

mfg
Gunter