|
Ublas :
|
- Next message: Ungermann, Jörn: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
- Previous message: sguazt: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
- In reply to: sguazt: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
- Next in thread: Ungermann, Jörn: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
Hello,
Am 28.08.2012 22:26, schrieb sguazt:
> Hi,
>
> After having done "svn update" (rev 80290), I've compiled the
> following tests with GCC 4.7.0:
>
>
> All test succeeded except:
> test_assignment
> test_coordinate_matrix_sort (as expected)
> test_inplace_solve
>
There a few more failures which I don't understand:
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/numeric-ublas.html
I think we should split some of the test and execute them for "simple"
matrices to get a better view on the real issues,
mfg
Gunter
- Next message: Ungermann, Jörn: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
- Previous message: sguazt: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
- In reply to: sguazt: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"
- Next in thread: Ungermann, Jörn: "Re: [ublas] broken coordinate_matrix::sort with gcc 4.7 (was: patches for #7297, #7296, #6514, #6511 on trunk - please verify)"