Re: [ublas] Status of development /Benchmarks

Subject: Re: [ublas] Status of development /Benchmarks
From: Nasos Iliopoulos (nasos_i_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-12-09 09:28:39

On 12/09/2013 07:22 AM, Rutger ter Borg wrote:
> On 2013-12-09 11:18, sguazt wrote:
>>
>>
>> +1 for a library with loosely-coupled feature, even if this means a
>> completely rewriting of uBLAS
>>
>> For the integration of computational kernels, why don't we use the
>> boost-numeric_bindings lib?
>>
>> Also, I'd like to have more MATLAB-like functionalities (I've
>> implemented some of them in boost-ublasx, but they relies on
>> boost-numeric_bindings and LAPACK functions)
>>
>
> If there is enough interest to integrate (parts of) the numeric 
> bindings library, I'm willing to help.
>
I think a part of the numeric bindings should be a part of uBLAS.
> Cheers,
>
> Rutger
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: athanasios.iliopoulos.ctr.gr_at_[hidden]