There is an additional issue that stands in the way of usage for some of us, and that it that the bindings don't appear to be covered by the Boost license. The header files have the right kind of reassuring words in them, but what is reassuring to me and what is reassuring to my company's attorneys are two different things. Would Kresimir Fresl, Toon Knapen and Karl Meerbergen consider changing the bindings to the Boost license?
Thanks
Mike Hayford

Jeffrey Brent McBeth wrote: 
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:23:40AM +0100, Gunter Winkler wrote:
<snip> 
  
So we decided to only support the necessary data types and rely on 
bindings.
    

This would be a lot more reasonable (meant in a polite way) if the bindings
were part of the distribution rather than hidden away in the sandbox and
often broken.

Jeff

  

_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublas@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas