Thank you Fres and Karl for agreeing to this. I'm not sure what the official Boost practice is, but it seems replacing the current copyright header comments with a more standard Boost copyright header is one step. Would someone with access to the bindings repository do this or put it on a list of things to do?
Thanks
Mike

Karl Meerbergen wrote: 
Quoting Kresimir Fresl <fresl@grad.hr>:
  
Mike Hayford wrote:

    
There is an additional issue that stands in the way of usage for
      
some of 
    
us, and that it that the bindings don't appear to be covered by the
      
Boost license. The header files have the right kind of reassuring
      
words 
    
in them, but what is reassuring to me and what is reassuring to my
      
company's attorneys are two different things. Would Kresimir Fresl,
      
Toon 
    
Knapen and Karl Meerbergen consider changing the bindings to the
      
Boost 
    
license?
      
I agree.

fres

    

OK for me.

Karl
_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublas@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas