On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Karl Meerbergen
<Karl.Meerbergen@cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:
Correction done.
Karl Meerbergen wrote:
> You are right of course. This should be corrected.
>
> Thanks for spotting this
>
> Karl
Thanks for the quick update. After thinking about this for an hour or so I have another idea. What about testing something like:
if( transpose_flag != 'N' ){
transpose_flag = 'T'; // For single or double precision
transpose_flag = 'C'; // For complex
}
This would allow a templated function to use the same flag for both complex and non-complex types, and have the binding sort it out. Would this bring bad karma?
Thanks again,
Jeremy