no and yes.<br>So far we have no parallelization at all, apart from the implicit vectorization made by the compiler. :-(<br>Yes it&#39;s in the pipe but honnestly, ublas needs to be transformed a little bit. I had a look at how Eigen is doing all the vector/parallel/multicore things and we need to make some change into the code base before doing that.<br>

<br>Also have a look at the numeric bindings in the boost repository, they give you access to plenty of nice fast code.<br><br>David<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04, Kraus Philipp <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de">philipp.kraus@flashpixx.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hello,<br>
<br>
I&#39;m using a lot of Boost UBlas structures. Does the UBlas structures use OpenMP? Is there a support in the future?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Phil<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ublas mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ublas@lists.boost.org">ublas@lists.boost.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas" target="_blank">http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas</a><br>
Sent to: <a href="mailto:david.bellot@gmail.com">david.bellot@gmail.com</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>