There has been a few changes and documentation written in fact. A few new algorithms has been added like the assignment operators.

It is actively maintained even if in it's current state there is not a lot to do.
In fact, I'm seriously thinking at ...

<flame wars>
- changing the core library to make it able to be faster, introduce new algorithms, and auto-vectorization

- removing the vector class in favor of a unique matrix class (and vector would simply be a one-column matrix). That would allow us to simply represent column and row vector and unify the computation engine

- be faster than eigen and armadillo: ok that one is gonna be pretty hard :-D
</flame wars>

Meanwhile, I'm slowly improving little things... Fortunately, I have been using ublas for my job for the last few years.
But for sure, it needs more love.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:15, Sean Reilly <campreilly@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm using uBLAS for a big project, and just wanted to see if it is
still being actively maintained. It doesn't seem like there have been
many changes in the last few years.

Sean Reilly
_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublas@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
Sent to: david.bellot@gmail.com