Giorgo,
there is definitely a thought of adding c++11 move semantics in uBLAS, but because at the moment there are ways around it, it is not considered an immediate priority. Adding said support is a fairly trivial task that needs though a careful design. If someone thinks he can do it for say one or more basic classes, I think it would immediately be acceptable into uBlas. A good start would be the design of relevant std::vector move semantic implementations that can be found around the web.

-Nasos

On 07/27/2013 04:34 AM, gsermaid wrote:

Hi all,

I am aware of the BOOST_UBLAS_MOVE_SEMANTICS, but I think I cannot use that in order to create my own move constructors in my own classes. Does ublas support rvalue references and if not, are there any plans for this?

Thanks,

Giorgos
_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublas@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
Sent to: athanasios.iliopoulos.ctr.gr@nrl.navy.mil