Thanks Ashar.

I would like you to also analyze the following proposal: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p1385r5.pdf
What is your take on engine types. Let us discuss about that.

Best,
Cem

Am Fr., 20. März 2020 um 13:42 Uhr schrieb Ashar via ublas <ublas@lists.boost.org>:
Hi Cem,

Thanks for the clarification. All my concerns and doubt about the proposal are finished and we are good to go. I will be sharing the proposal soon here titled : "Boost.uBLAS: Stabilizing, Enhancing and C++20-ification". Each phase will have one of the thing mentioned here completed. During first phase, I will be stabilizing the code that we worked last year, notably the static_extent, sub tensor and other interfaces. Second phase will be enhancing which will involve producing a new matrix and vector type based on tensor, Finally I would be implementing the C++20 concepts to replace all meta functions and restricting the template parameters. This will be as per your wish could be carried on a different branch.

Regards
Ashar
_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublas@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
Sent to: cem.bassoy@gmail.com