Boost Announcement :
Subject: [Boost-announce] Boost.Algorithms Review Begins today
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-23 00:21:19
The review period for the proposed Boost.Algorithms library, by Marshall
Clow, begins today (September 22) and runs through Oct 1. I'm pleased
to act as review manager.
,----[ Important Notes ]
| - Please do not post your review or discussion as a reply to this
| - Please begin your review's subject line with "[Review:Algorithms]"
| - Please feel free to note any individual issues in the GitHub issue
| tracker and make reference to them from your review.
| - Please see below for *further* important notes
You can find the library at https://github.com/mclow/Boost.Algorithm.
If you don't want to use Git, you can get a .zip or tarball snapshot at
The Boost Algorithms library is a work in progress; it is not meant to
be a complete set of general purpose algorithms for C++ programming;
but rather a small collection of useful algorithms, and a structure
for adding more over time.
The algorithms here fall into three basic categories:
- Boyer-Moore Search
- Boyer-Moore-Horspool Search
- Knuth-Morris-Pratt search
2. Sequence properties
- Tests to see if a sequence is ordered
- Tests for the elements of a sequence
- Constrain a value between two 'boundaries' (minmax)
Potential Interactions with Existing Boost Libraries
This submission potentially interacts with all of the following existing
* foreach - http://boost.org/libs/foreach
* minmax - http://boost.org/libs/algorithm/minmax
* range - http://boost.org/libs/range
* string_algo - http://boost.org/libs/algorithm/string_algo
Reviewers should consider these potential interactions.
What to include in Review Comments
- Keep your criticism constructive. Constructive criticism usually
comes with specific suggestions for improvement.
- If you identify problems along the way, please note if they are minor,
serious, or showstoppers.
- Please *do* vote on whether the library should be accepted. Everyone
who takes the time to look at the library is qualified to vote, and
every vote is valuable.
- Other questions you might want to answer in your review:
* What is your evaluation of the design?
* What is your evaluation of the implementation?
* What is your evaluation of the documentation?
* What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
* Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
* How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
* Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost-announce list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk