Any review discussion should take place on the developers' list (
boost@lists.boost.org), and anyone may submit a formal review, either publicly to the entire list or privately to just myself.
As usual, please consider the following questions in your formal review:
What is your evaluation of the design?
What is your evaluation of the implementation?
What is your evaluation of the documentation?
What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
And, most importantly, please explicitly answer the following question:
Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost
library?
Lastly, please consider that John and Christopher have compiled a TODO list [1] based on pre-review comments. Feel free to comment on the priority and necessity of such TODO items, and whether any might be show-stoppers or warrant conditional acceptance of the library.
Thanks in advance; looking forward to the discussion!
- Jeff (& John & Christopher)
[1]
http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/big_number/libs/multiprecision/doc/html/boost_multiprecision/map/todo.html