Re: [jamboost] Property utilities

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-03 08:26:05

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]>

> Now that compose-requirements is found to be the same as
apply-requirements,
> can we go with 'apply-requirements' only?

I still don't think the name is right. The problem with "apply" is that
traditionally it means there is an operator and an operand. In other
words, we might apply a function to an argument or apply requirements to
a target. However, both arguments are requirements lists AFAICT, so I
think "refine" would be better.

-Dave