Re: [jamboost] symmetric/optional features

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-05 07:53:00

David Abrahams wrote:

> > > Optional features should be accounted for after build-request.expand, I
> > > think. Once the build-request is expanded, we then look at all
>
> non-optional
>
> > > features and stick in default values if they're not represented in the
> > > build.
> >
> > Yes, you are right. Can you implement it?
>
> Done. See feature.add-defaults.

I'm afraid that you have forgot to commit it :-)

Thanks,
Volodya