Re: [jamboost] Boost.Build stress test

From: Ali Azarbayejani (ali_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-20 16:45:20

David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> >> I'm very interested in do-nothing timing. Can you run "bjam -d+10" on an
> >> unmodified tree and send me the output. This will tell what consumes most
> >> time.
> >>
> >>> <B> Command line overflow on link (Show-stopper!). Some reasons
> >>> <C> Command line overflow on compile (Show-stopper!). Some reasons
> >>> <D> Command line overflow on archive/dll (Show-stopper!). Some
> >
> > Something's suspicious about this, at least if he's using the gcc
> > toolset... Oh, yeah; I forgot we need to add a small enhancement for
> > potentially long one-line actions on NT.
> 
> Done. Ali, please try your build again with -d+4. You should see a
> bunch of messages saying:
> 
> "Executing raw command directly"
> 
> Before each invocation of g++.

Actually, for me this produces no output whatsoever...even the
"gcc.compile ..." lines do not come out.

--Ali