Re: [jamboost] [BBv2] implicit-dependencies

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-22 07:11:23

Jürgen Hunold wrote:
> Hi !
>
> First of all, the new <implicit-dependencies> feature is working fine.
> Thanx Volodya.

Great. I'm considering yet another optimization, but will post when I have 
time to coherently express my idea.

> But I've still problems building on Win32 due to command-line overflows.
> It seems that the exe-target still add _all_ implicit-dependencies from
> the used libraries to the compiler command line.
> I thought this behaviour would be removed, too.

Could you locate the "subvariant-dg" class in virtual-target.jam module, 
remove the second for loop in constructor and see if this improves things?

- Volodya