Re: [jamboost] Re: v2 inoperative on WinXP and Re: [V2] [patch] Jamfile.v2 for thread

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-09 14:38:49

Should I infer from this that we shouldn't bother running the tests every day?

At Monday 2004-08-09 12:29, you wrote:
>Michael Stevens <Michael.Stevens_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > On Monday 09 August 2004 16:52, Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
> >> I've been getting the following for a few days (sorry I didn't spot it
> >> earlier, I was having difficulties setting up the regression tests).
> >
> > On Friday 06 August 2004 08:47, Jürgen Hunold wrote:
> >> Hi !
> >>
> >> It seems someone removed threadmon.cpp from boost.threads and forgot to
> >> change the Jamfile for V2.
> >
> > It seems the that this is the same issue. Looking at the recent commit 
> 1.32 to
> > Jamfile it seems that more then just 'threadmon' was dropped. Instead 
> it was
> > replaced by tss_hooks tss_dll tss_pe. Since Vladimir is on holiday it 
> would
> > seem someone else needs to commit a patch. I have therefore done so.
> >
> > Please complain ASAP if my changes are incorrect.
>
>Just to be clear: currently, Boost library authors are not expected to
>maintain Jamfile.v2's, or even understand BBv2. Vladimir has been
>doing that while BBv2 remains in a pre-release state. Of course,
>it's nice when a library author can keep a v2 Jamfile up-to-date, but
>it's nobody's fault when they stop working.
>
>--
>Dave Abrahams
>Boost Consulting
>http://www.boost-consulting.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"