Re: [jamboost] Re: STLPort without iostreams gets wrongly named in bjam v1

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-08-12 00:39:34

aneubeck2004 wrote:

>>Rene Rivera wrote:
>>
>>>So in a way it's doing the correct things. But it's also misleading.
>>
>>PS. One possible "fix" is to remove all that code, and let the 
>>compilation fail if one specifies <stlport-iostreams>off.
>>
>>Thoughts?
> 
> Another solution would be:
> keep the code and add a warning for the user
> (something like: <stlport_iostreams>off is not supported with ...)

<sarcasm> Strange, I went for the ultimate solution ;-) </<sarcasm>>

I just fixed it so that the names are correctly generated to match the 
variant. And if you specify <stlport-iostreams>off it will just ignore 
you and force the streams on.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq