Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-04 02:04:37

Next message: TEMPLIE CÃ©dric: "Re: ** please avoid overquoting **"
Previous message: Toon Knapen: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Projects and attributes"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Re: propagation of usage-requirements"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: propagation of usage-requirements"

A few weeks back we had a big discussion on the propagation of
usage-requirements. What is now the conclusion. IUC usage requirements
are not propagated all the way, only to the 'direct' dependents, right?

Previous message: Toon Knapen: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Projects and attributes"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Re: propagation of usage-requirements"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: propagation of usage-requirements"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk