[Boost-build] [Repost] Boost.Build v1 broken?

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-21 23:36:22

Our continuous regressions against CVS HEAD have been failing for the
last 24 hours or so with the following log:

******************************************************
Building Boost.Iostreams with bzip2 support disabled.
To enable bzip2, consult the Boost.Iostreams documentation
******************************************************
******************************************************
Building Boost.Iostreams with zlib and gzip support disabled.
To enable zlib and gzip, consult the Boost.Iostreams documentation
******************************************************
Building Boost.Regex with the optional Unicode/ICU support disabled.
Please refer to the Boost.Regex documentation for more information
(and if you don't know what ICU is then you probably don't need it).
MFC/ATL regex wrappers will be tested when building with VC7.1
MFC/ATL regex wrappers will be tested when building with VC7
boost-test(RUN) "any/any_to_ref_test" : "libs\any\test\any_to_ref_test.cpp"
boost-test(RUN) "any/any_test" : "libs\any\any_test.cpp"

[...]

boost-test(RUN) "date_time/testtime_serialize" : "libs\date_time\test\posix_time\testtime_serialize.cpp"
boost-test(RUN) "date_time/testtime_serialize_std_config" : "libs\date_time\test\posix_time\testtime_serialize.cpp"
**** DLLs cannot be built with this compiler and stlport 4.x ****
**** skipping build of <@boost!libs!serialization!build>boost_serialization.dll; toolset= vc-6_5-stlport variant= debug ****
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:1585: in find-compatible-subvariant
*** argument error
* rule split-target-subvariant ( target-var properties-var toolset-var variant-var : subvariant )
* called with: ( sv-target sv-properties sv-toolset sv-variant :  )
* missing argument subvariant
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:2032:see definition of rule 'split-target-subvariant' being called
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:1654: in link-libraries
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:1857: in generate-dependencies
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:1964: in subvariant-target
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:2057: in main-target
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\boost-base.jam:1369: in declare-local-target
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\testing.jam:64: in boost-test
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\testing.jam:552: in run
..\libs\date_time\test\Jamfile:220: in load-jamfiles
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\allyourbase.jam:1764: in SubInclude
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools/build/v1\allyourbase.jam:1352: in subinclude
Jamfile:25: in load-jamfiles
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\tools\build\v1\bootstrap.jam:21: in boost-build
C:\Users\Administrator\boost\main\boost\boost-build.jam:16: in module scope

Does this ring a bell to anybody?

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering