Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-04 22:52:02


Rene Rivera wrote:
> Could you try your tests by using "<target-os>hpux" instead of
> "<os>HPUX"? Using "target-os" handles the possibility of cross-compiling.

<target-os>hpux did not work. I also tried <target-os>HPUX (I'm not sure
if name of the OS is treated as case-sensitive). In both cases, a file with
.so suffix was created.

Boris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]>; "Boost.Build developer's and user's
list" <boost-build_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Boost-build] controlling suffix of a dynamic library file in BBv2

> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>> Hi Phillip,
>>
>> using PYTHON_EXTENSION was an excellent suggestion. Thank you. I don't know
>> how
>> I could overlook this variable.
>>
>> I've added
>>
>> type.set-generated-target-suffix PYTHON_EXTENSION : <os>HPUX : sl ;
>
> Could you try your tests by using "<target-os>hpux" instead of
> "<os>HPUX"? Using "target-os" handles the possibility of cross-compiling.
>
>
>
> --
> -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
> -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
> -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
> -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>
>


Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk