|
Boost-Build : |
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-23 14:11:03
The problem described below is now on the critical path for 1.36. Steven
Watanabe attached a patch to the bug report 3 months ago:
http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1584
Can somebody pls verify the patch and commit ASAP?
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com ==Original Message== Vladimir Prus wrote: > Jurko GospodnetiÄ wrote: > >> Hi Eric. >> >>> Not an expert, but I'll try to take a whack at it later today (in >>> about 8 hours). Never used docbook/quickbook/boostbook though and don't >>> really understand what and how that stuff works so bare with me. :-) >> Sorry, once I wrote this real-life work stepped in and been doing >> 16-hour work-days since then. :-( >> >> Will try to look at this today... > > What's happening, it seems is that doxygen.jam has this: > > targets.main-target-alternative > [ new alias-target-class $(target) : $(project) > : > : [ targets.main-target-requirements $(requirements) > : $(project) ] > : [ targets.main-target-default-build $(default-build) : $(project) ] > : [ targets.main-target-usage-requirements $(usage-requirements) > <dependency>$(target:S=.xml) > : $(project) ] > ] ; > > So it tries to add a dependency property to usage requirements. The dependecy > properties are tricky -- they are specified using target ids, but when > a target is build, dependency property are converted to contain the virtual > targets created from corresponding target ids. When dependency property is > used in usage requirements, we return a dependency property that already has > virtual target as value, and when other targets try to treat that value > as target id, we go boom. > > The possible solutions are: > > - Don't convert dependency property values to target in usage requirements. > The problem here is that 'some_target' might be valid in usage requirements > in one project, but won't be valid in some other project far far away. > - Disallow dependency properties in usage requirements. In fact, I think > using <dependency> requirement, not usage requirement will work just fine > in most cases -- except here. Since alias does not produces any targets, > <dependency> requirement will get ignored. > > I think I'd need to think more about this. > > - Volodya
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk