Re: [Boost-build] bjam 4.0.. in C++

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] bjam 4.0.. in C++
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-14 14:16:45

AMDG

Philipp Thomas wrote:
> * Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden]) [20100522 19:58]:
>
>   
>> But even if we do end up using compiled-libs they would be directly
>> statically compiled in anyway as using the BBv2 build files for the would
>> be out of the question.
>>     
>
> Sorry for jumping in late. I just wanted to remind you that you shouldn't
> depend on static libs being built.  We at Novell/SuSE for instance don't
> build/distribute them at all.
>   

I think the idea is that bjam wouldn't use a static or shared
library at all.  The sources would just be compiled into bjam.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe