Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Segfault in bjam
From: Philipp Thomas (pth_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-31 13:23:15

Next message: Renaud Lepère: "[Boost-build] address-model and optional feature"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] building qt4 project"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] Segfault in bjam"

* Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden]) [20100826 18:52]:

> I took Noel's comment to mean that bjam does respect MAXJOBS, but the current
> setting is larger than fd_set structure is able to keep.

But at least a quick glance at the boost-jam code seemed to show that it
doesn't in all cases. I'll reexamine one I get time for it.

> I was not able to figure, or find any define, that tells how many
> descriptors fd_set can hold.

AFAIK there is no limit, but I'll see what SUS and POSIX have to say on
that.

Philipp

Next message: Renaud Lepère: "[Boost-build] address-model and optional feature"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] building qt4 project"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] Segfault in bjam"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk