Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] [requires] cxx11_variadic_macros
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-16 03:29:47

Next message: Edward Diener: "Re: [Boost-build] From where do compiler options come ?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] From where do compiler options come ?"
In reply to: Raffi Enficiaud: "Re: [Boost-build] [requires] cxx11_variadic_macros"

> So it looks more or less safe to enforce BOOST_PP_VARIADICS=1 in
> boost.test.
>

Just so you know, that creates a header include issue: if something else
is included before Boost.Test which includes PP lib code then variadic
support in PP will *not* get enabled. I would guess that's a pretty
common situation for other Boost libraries using Test.

John.

Next message: Edward Diener: "Re: [Boost-build] From where do compiler options come ?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] From where do compiler options come ?"
In reply to: Raffi Enficiaud: "Re: [Boost-build] [requires] cxx11_variadic_macros"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk