David and Phillip -<br><br>Thanks for the responses.<br><br>I obviously made a blunder and didn&#39;t use: bjam &quot;-sTOOLS=darwin&quot;.<br><br>One thing I noticed was compiling the hello world for debug works using: bjam
<br><br>That threw me off, when I did a: bjam release<br><br>Is there a requirement to have python installed when building boost proper?&nbsp; I noticed 6 targets failed related to the unit testing and wondered if they were related to python.
<br><br>Best regards,<br>Aaron R&gt;<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Phillip Seaver</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:phil@apago.com">phil@apago.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
David Abrahams wrote, on 4/19/2007 4:12 AM:<br>&gt; on Thu Apr 19 2007, Phillip Seaver &lt;phil-AT-apago.com&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; Based on the output directory, it looks like you&#39;re doing &quot;using gcc
<br>&gt;&gt; ...&quot; when you need to do &quot;using darwin ...&quot;.<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; How many times do people need to make this mistake before we recognize<br>&gt; that gcc should refer to the apple compiler by default, on MacOS X?
<br>&gt;<br><br>It looks like gcc.jam has enough other platform-specific code in it<br>these days to justify moving the OS X support into there.&nbsp;&nbsp;I&#39;ll try to<br>find some time to do it, unless someone more qualified wants to.&nbsp;&nbsp;:-)
<br><br>I probably won&#39;t be able to get to it for the next week or so, but it<br>fits in with my long-term plans to make a toolset for OS X that handles<br>SDK&#39;s, universal binaries, target OS version, application bundles, etc.
<br><br>Phillip<br>_______________________________________________<br>Unsubscribe &amp; other changes: <a href="http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build">http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
</a><br></blockquote></div><br>