On Friday 05 February 2010 04:53:01 Vladimir Prus wrote:

I wonder if separate compile.fortran and compile.fortran90 are now still

necessary. I see that fortran90 has some extra goodies, like serializing

compilation, or passing the -module option, but maybe this can be always

done?

Not really sure.  I thought the same thing when I was submitting that patch.  

I just don't know the consequences of using the fortran90 compile line.  I 

don't have too much Fortran code, and even less Fortran90 as of yet, but I do 

need it supported similarly between several compilers.  Perhaps Noel can 

comment.