Thanks. Compilers have increased their focus on error output a lot and the new clang colors are very helpful. 


Gaurav Chakravorty   
Circulum Vite LLC

2500 PLAZA 5 . Harborside Financial Center, 
Jersey City, NJ 07311-4026
Tel: 201-377-2302      Fax: 201-604-5422     Cell: 201-500-7416

This communication and any attachments may be privileged or confidential. Copying or forwarding without permission of sender is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you have received this in error and any review, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. In such an event, please notify us immediately by reply email or by phone (+1-201-377-2302) and immediately delete this message and all attachments. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. The authenticity of the sender cannot be claimed in any litigation.



On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Wieger Wesselink <wieger@operamail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Gaurav Chakravorty wrote:

My current understanding is that boost.build suppresses the colors clang emits in rinting errors .
I tried making sure that TERM is xterm-256color.
But still the colors don't show.
 
Any leads ?
 
Thanks
Gaurav Chakravorty   
Circulum Vite LLC
 


_______________________________________________
 
 
There is a trac ticket for this feature: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3508 .
 
Regards,
 
Wieger
-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build