I can add that, sure - though maybe putting all possible spellings in a tutorial will
be confusion it itself? Maybe, that should be part of reference docs, not tutorial?

True; the tutorial should keep simple, but maybe it could include remark linking to reference?

(Or may be it's time to deprecate some of them, such as the '.v2'
variants that, I assume, as there for only historical reasons.)

It sounds good, but I would deprecate only in the docs, not showing warnings etc. Many may use it, I don't know.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name> wrote:
On 25.09.2015 04:40, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On 25-Sep-15 3:16 AM, Paulo Márcio Figueiredo Alves wrote:
>> It also accepts build.jam and project-root.jam, which is what I
>> prefer to
>> use; seems less redundant.
>> And indeed it would be nice find it in the docs.
>
> I can add that, sure - though maybe putting all possible spellings in
> a tutorial will
> be confusion it itself? Maybe, that should be part of reference docs,
> not tutorial?

(Or may be it's time to deprecate some of them, such as the '.v2'
variants that, I assume, as there for only historical reasons.)

    Stefan

--

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build