Yeah sorry, shame on me. It would be for the best, since the warning will push them to update.

So deprecate it +1

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:36 AM Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name> wrote:

On 25.09.2015 07:22, Paulo Márcio Figueiredo Alves wrote:
>
>     (Or may be it's time to deprecate some of them, such as the '.v2'
>     variants that, I assume, as there for only historical reasons.)
>
>
> It sounds good, but I would deprecate only in the docs, not showing
> warnings etc. Many may use it, I don't know.

On the contrary, deprecating a feature means:

* not documenting it at all
* emitting a warning on its use

Otherwise deprecation is void of any sense.

        Stefan

--

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build