<div dir="auto"><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 26, 2018 4:52 PM, &quot;Robert Ramey via Boost-build&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:boost-build@lists.boost.org">boost-build@lists.boost.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="elided-text">On 2/26/18 1:44 PM, Rene Rivera via Boost-build wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="elided-text">
I think I&#39;ve fixed all the problems I can fix in the new style docs &lt;<a href="https://grafikrobot.github.io/b2doc/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://grafikrobot.github.io<wbr>/b2doc/</a>&gt; for b2:<br>
<br>
* Fully updated with develop docs.<br>
* Works offline as well as it does online.<br>
* All the cross-links work.<br>
* Marked up all the code to be syntax colored.<br>
<br>
Big question is now.. Go with this or no? Note, that this would be a change for some future release not the current Boost 1.67 cycle.<br></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
My question is: Are these new docs or is a reformatting of the original documentation using a new system?<br></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The latter for now. The goal is for new content to come from here.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Rene.</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div></div>