On 2019-05-22 2:28 p.m., Andrew Voelkel wrote:

That is helpful. It might indeed be an issue with System Integrity Protection, now that I do the right google search.

 

But that leads to the second question. It is possible to indicate within hello_ext.so where to look for the dylib. Then in theory this wouldn’t a problem, because I wouldn’t need to set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH.

 

Is this insertion of the path of libboost_python37.dylib into hello_ext.so something I can do with bjam, or am I going to have to figure out how to use a separate build system?

I'm cross-posting this to the Boost.Build mailing list, since that's the best (only ?) place where you'll get an answer to this question.


Stefan
--

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...