Boost logo

Boost Interest :

Subject: Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-30 14:17:13


on Wed Oct 29 2008, "Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

>> I added some debugging into the BoostCore.cmake modularization code so that
>> I can try and figure out what has been and has NOT been modularized. What I
>> am coming up with is 27 libraries have been modularized and there are 79
>> libraries. So that leaves 52 libraries to be modularized. Is that Correct?
>
> That sounds right. I suggest modularizing from the leaves, and
> avoiding trying to modularize those libraries that are tangled in the
> core of Boost-config, type_traits, MPL, preprocessor, etc.

Doug, what's your opinion of where that should go in the long run?
Should we leave it alone, or should we eventually break these things
down into modularizable pieces?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk