Boost logo

Boost Interest :

Subject: Re: [Boost-cmake] Boost-CMake with recent changes from upstream
From: G S (stokestack_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-26 19:21:07


Sounds like you did everyone a favor. Thanks.

Why isn't the CMake state being kept up to date in the first place?
Is it because there's an effort to make a whole competing Boost build
system? What's the rationale for that?

Seems a bit wasteful to come up with a whole new system, when the time
could be spent improving CMake if necessary. Why bloat Boost?


Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk