Re: [Boost-testing] Can the BOOST_WARN_MESSAGE be made to have avisible effect?

From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-14 13:06:24

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> 
> Use --preserve-test-targets (or whatever proper argument for the bjam 
> version 2)
> to keep test executable even if it passed the test.
> 

....

> No. This is bjam invokation. You need to somehow supply 
> the --log-level=warning to the test invocation. In Jamfile there is rule 
> invokation with ':' separated arguments. One of the section is test 
> arguments. Check Boost.Build docs.
> 

Ok, I managed these. Thank you for having helped.

> As for the above report table, you better ask 
> guys who manage it what needs to be done for the test to be marked 
> appropriately.

It seems, I was under a wrong assumption. These tables are only 
passed/failed. There is no notion of "warning". Warnings seem not to 
carry over nicely to boost regression runs.

So I try to make it a failure with the macro BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE and 
supply a meaningful "warning" message to calm the user.

I guess I also should mark the error as expected, shouldn't I?

Roland